author role in online submission and peer review systems of iranian medical journals

نویسندگان

fereydoun azadeh department of medical library and information sciences, school of allied medical sciences, tehran university of medical sciences, tehran, iran.

alireza hemmati center for academic and health policy, tehran university of medical sciences, tehran, iran; institute for humanities and social sciences, academic center for education, culture, and research, tehran, iran.

javad ghazi-mir-saeed department of medical library and information sciences, school of allied medical sciences, tehran university of medical sciences, tehran, iran.

tania azadi school of allied medical sciences, tehran university of medical sciences, tehran, iran.

چکیده

since the late 1990s, different web-based submission and peer review systems have emerged, and significant numbers of journals have shifted from their old paper-based systems to the web-based ones. exploring the main features of these online systems might lead to better understand this flow. this study was performed to examine the features and capabilities of online submissions and peer review systems, with focus on the  author role,  which have been currently using by iranian, approved medical and biomedical journals. this descriptive study was conducted during 2011-2012. the population of the study was peer review systems of approved medical and biomedical journals by ministry of health and medical education, iran. in  this term, 199 journals were identified. data were gathered by a standardized, researcher made checklist. the data were analyzed using spss 18 and microsoft excel 2007. 27 out of 199 journals were using no systems. 21 out of 199 were using 12 systems with inaccessible information or unknown status (which were removed from this study), and 151 journals were using 6 systems which were examined in this study. evaluated systems were more than 80% in compliance with the research checklist. due to rapid changes in information technology and information systems` designs, it is required for such systems to be constantly evaluated. it is of high value to investigate new demands of beneficiary groups like authors and researchers, editorial boards, and reviewers in this regard.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

بررسی سامانه‌های تحت وب عرضه و داوری مقالات از نظر قابلیت‌های نقش نویسنده در نشریات مصوب وزارت بهداشت

Background and Aim: Online submission and peer review systems are formal channels of communication among authors, journal editorial boards, and reviewers. The review process starts after authors submit their manuscripts. The aim of this study is to examine the online article submission and peer review systems in terms of the capability in medical journals of Iranian Ministry of Health, and Medi...

متن کامل

a contrastive study of rhetorical functions of citation in iranian and international elt scopus journals

writing an academic article requires the researchers to provide support for their works by learning how to cite the works of others. various studies regarding the analysis of citation in m.a theses have been done, while little work has been done on comparison of citations among elt scopus journal articles, and so the dearth of research in this area demands for further investigation into citatio...

Peer Review Process in Medical Journals

Reviewers play key roles in manuscript processing and publication. This article describes in detail how the reviewer serves their two key roles as a gatekeeper of making publication recommendations for the editorial board and a consultant providing constructive comments to authors to improve the quality of the manuscripts to be published.

متن کامل

Challenges in the Selection, Design and Implementation of an Online Submission and Peer Review System for STM Journals

Two international scientific publishers collaborated to develop an Online Submission and Peer Review System (OSPREY) for their journals. Our goals were to meet market demand, increase editorial efficiency and streamline the transition from peer review to publishing. One of the publishers (National Research Council (NRC) Research Press, Canada) had previously purchased a third-party system that ...

متن کامل

post publication peer review in iranian biomedical journals

background: letters to the editor provide an opportunity for readers to state their views about published articles. research on this issue has been mainly on western journals and there is no study on the iranian journals. the present study aimed to investigate this subject in iranian biomedical journals. materials and method: this was a bibliometric study. the databases of iran medex, medlib, a...

متن کامل

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید


عنوان ژورنال:
international journal of occupational hygiene

جلد ۶، شماره ۳، صفحات ۱۳۷-۱۴۲

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023